Rubric

Find Rubric
Project 1: Simple Data Comparisons (1)
Project 1: Simple Data Comparisons (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
What variables did you pick for this project?
threshold: pts
2 pts
Full Marks
At least four variables and at least one is categorical.
1 pts
partial marks
Doesn't have at least four variables and at least one isn't categorical.
0 pts
No Marks
Not provided/completely lacking in substance
pts
2 pts
--
What comparisons are you going to do for this project?
threshold: pts
2 pts
Full Marks
Three comparisons and includes correct data type.
1 pts
partial marks
Doesn't have three comparisons or didn't include correct data type for some of the variables.
0 pts
No Marks
Not provided/completely lacking in substance
pts
2 pts
--
What is your hypothesis about how the variables are related to each other?
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Three well thought out hypothesis that relates well to the variables.
2 pts
partial marks
Two well thought out to pretty well thought out hypothesis that relates well to the variables.
1 pts
partial marks
One pretty well thought out hypothesis that relates well to the variables.
0 pts
No Marks
Not provided/completely lacking in substance.
pts
3 pts
--
What method are you using to analyze the data for each of your three comparisons?
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Correct methods were picked for all three comparisons.
2 pts
Partial marks
Correct methods were picked for two comparisons.
1 pts
partial marks
Correct methods were picked for one comparison.
0 pts
No Marks
Not provided/completely lacking in substance.
pts
3 pts
--
Minitab output (Boxplot, scatter plot, Table of counts/percents, Bar chart etc) for each comparison.
threshold: pts
6 pts
Full Marks
Output is correct for all three comparisons. At least two different methods used.
4 pts
Partial marks
Output is correct for 2 comparisons. At least two different methods used.
2 pts
Partial marks
Output is correct for 1 comparisons.
0 pts
No Marks
Not provided/completely lacking in substance.
pts
6 pts
--
State if your hypothesis for each comparison was supported (or not) and what specific evidence you used to make this decision.
threshold: pts
6 pts
Full Marks
Well thought out explanation of findings. Specific statistical evidence was used to help illustrate findings (Ex: Mean, SD, Five number summary, etc) for all three comparisons.
4 pts
Partial credit
Pretty well thought out explanation of findings. Specific statistical evidence was used to help illustrate findings (Ex: Mean, SD, Five number summary, etc) for two comparisons.
2 pts
Partial credit
Not well thought out evidence used to illustrate findings. Specific statistical evidence was used to help illustrate findings (Ex: Mean, SD, Five number summary, etc) for one comparison.
0 pts
No Marks
Not provided/completely lacking in substance.
pts
6 pts
--
Did you expect these findings or were you surprised by any of your findings?
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Full explanation provided and critical thinking is illustrated.
1.5 pts
Partial marks
Partial explanation provided.
0 pts
No Marks
Not provided/completely lacking in substance.
pts
3 pts
--
Total Points: 25 out of 25