Rubric

Find Rubric
Project 1: Student Survey
Project 1: Student Survey
Criteria Ratings Pts
Title page
threshold: pts
1 pts
Full Marks
Title page was there with correct information.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
1 pts
--
Abstract
A brief summary of the research. Normally has a sentence about the purpose, what was done, what was found, what it means. So 4-6 sentences total.
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Well thought out Abstract that met all requirements.
1.5 pts
partial marks
Lacking full development.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
3 pts
--
Introduction
For this project it should be a brief one paragraph explanation of (1) what the purpose of our research was and (2) what you hoped to find/learn from doing this project.
threshold: pts
5 pts
Full Marks
Full well thought out Introduction that met all requirements.
2.5 pts
partial marks
Introduction needed more explanation or information.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
5 pts
--
Methodology: Participants
Who was the data collected from? As part of this make sure to provide the (1) exact number of people who participated in the survey and (2) demographics information. For demographics give the count and percent for the following variables: Student Status, Work Status, Parent, and Gender.
threshold: pts
5 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
3.5 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
2 pts
partial marks
Missing a number of requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
5 pts
--
Methodology: Materials
What materials were used to conduct this study? Survey? What was on the survey? This is where you provide the data dictionary.
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
1.5 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
3 pts
--
Methodology: Procedures
Explain what was done to collect the data.
threshold: pts
2 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
1 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
2 pts
--
Results: Initial Results
Descriptive Statistics, Counts, What variables did you pick? Categorical/numeric, why did you pick these variables/comparisons?
threshold: pts
6 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
4 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
2 pts
partial marks
Missing a number of requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
6 pts
--
Results: Comparison 1
1. Variables used for comparison 2. Hypothesis for comparison 3. Method used to compare the data 4. Minitab output
threshold: pts
6 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
4 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
2 pts
partial marks
Missing a number of requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
6 pts
--
Results: Comparison 2
1. Variables used for comparison 2. Hypothesis for comparison 3. Method used to compare the data 4. Minitab output
threshold: pts
6 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
4 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
2 pts
partial marks
Missing a number of requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
6 pts
--
Results: Comparison 3
1. Variables used for comparison 2. Hypothesis for comparison 3. Method used to compare the data 4. Minitab output
threshold: pts
6 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
4 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
2 pts
partial marks
Missing a number of requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
6 pts
--
Discussion: Hypothesis supported (or not)
State if your hypothesis for each comparison was supported (or not) and what specific evidence you used to make this decision. For specific evidence remember that this is a statistics class so make sure to include any appropriate numbers that help illustrate your findings (Ex: Mean, SD, Five number summary, etc).
threshold: pts
12 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
8 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
4 pts
partial marks
Missing a number of requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
12 pts
--
Discussion: Surprised by findings?
Did you expect these findings or were you surprised by any of your findings?
threshold: pts
3 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
1.5 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
3 pts
--
Discussion: Do the results Generalize?
Explain why you think these results can or can't be generalized out to the larger population of students at Richland. What about other Colleges?
threshold: pts
6 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
4 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
2 pts
partial marks
Missing a number of requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
6 pts
--
Discussion: Potential Issues?
Play critical thinker and try to address any potential issues someone might bring up against your report based on the methods of how the data was collected and the sample population.
threshold: pts
6 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
4 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
2 pts
partial marks
Missing a number of requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
6 pts
--
Overall quality
Overall quality of the paper was high. Headings were labeled and content was well organized and displayed in an easy to read format. Writing was clear and concise.
threshold: pts
5 pts
Full Marks
Met or exceeded all requirements.
2.5 pts
partial marks
Didn't quite meet all requirements.
0 pts
No Marks
Missing or completely lacking in substance.
pts
5 pts
--
Total Points: 75 out of 75